Design of Website Questions

Functionality

1. Navigating Between Pages.

1. There was difficulty navigating.(e.g. it was not possible to link back to home page)
2. The majority of the site was easy to navigate, however one or more areas was difficult.
3. The site was easy to navigate. I could always get back to the home page readily.
4. The site used frames or some other consistent organization such as a web map to make it very easy to navigate.

2. Size, Layout and Navigation on Pages.

1. There were problems navigating on some pages, perhaps there is too much content on a single page.
2. All pages worked well. It was relatively easy to find the required information on all pages.
3. The home page was quick to load without too many complicated graphics.
4. The pages were very well organized Looking through pages kept your interest and you found information easily.

Technology

3. Stable Launch System.

1. The problem has been defined for the launch system.
2. The solution is presented for the launch system.
3. The solution is presented and explained effectively with rational.
4. Graphics is used effectively to enhance the explanation of the concept.

4. Rocket Design (Time in the Air)

1. The problem has been defined for the rocket design.
2. The solution is presented for the rocket design.
3. The solution is presented and explained effectively with rational.
4. Graphics is used effectively to enhance the explanation of the concept.

5. Crash Protection of Egg.

1. The problem has been defined for the crash protection of the egg.
2. The solution is presented for the crash protection of the egg.
3. The solution is presented and explained effectively with rational.
4. Graphics is used effectively to enhance the explanation of the concept.

Promotion

6. Effectiveness of Promotion.

1. The site contained promotion of the rocket.
2. The promotion of the rocket was somewhat interesting.
3. The promotion was effective and made the viewer feel some positive emotion or motivation to see the rocket launch.
4. The site appeared very exciting and was truly motivating.

7. Interest, Appropriateness.

1. I felt that the site was not appropriate for the subject matter.
2. Some areas of the web site were appropriate but there were one or more areas which were inappropriate.
3. Graphics were used effectively in a professional manner suitable for the subject matter.
4. The site was professional, used graphics appropriately and perhaps links were included to appropriate external sites.

8. Critical Evaluation of Project.

1. Two good points and Two bad points were indicated.
2. Reasons why points are good and bad were indicated.
3. Improvements were discussed.
4. Improved design was presented clearly with a description or possibly with the use of graphics.