Summer Art
Project Rubric Name:
__________________________________
Quality of
Analysis (TI)
|
Achievement Level |
Descriptor |
|
0 |
Level 1 is not achieved. |
|
1-2 |
There is no inquiry into answers, only
description. There are very few attempts at justifying the main points for
the answers. |
|
3-4 |
The answers partly explore, but largely
describe. There is some justification of main points in the answers. There is
some coherent argument. |
|
5-6 |
The answers explore the issues. Most
points are justified; most arguments are coherent. Some counter claims may be
considered. |
|
7-8 |
The answers explore with some insight,
in some depth and/or detail. All or nearly all the main points are justified
and the arguments are coherent.
Counter claims are considered for some questions. |
|
9-10 |
The answers explore with a high degree
of insight, in considerable depth and/or detail. All main points are
justified and arguments are coherent and compelling. Counter claims are
considered for most questions.
|
KnowerÕs
perspective (AP)
|
Achievement Level |
Descriptor |
|
0 |
Level 1 was not achieved. |
|
1-2 |
The assignment, in its use of arguments
and examples, or otherwise, showed limited personal involvement and did not
demonstrate the significance of the assignment. |
|
3-4 |
The assignment, in its use of arguments
and examples or otherwise, showed some personal involvement and adequately
demonstrated the significance of the assignment. |
|
5 |
The assignment, in its distinctively
personal use of arguments and examples or otherwise, showed clear personal
involvement and fully demonstrated the significance of the topic. |
Connections (AP)
|
Achievement Level |
Descriptor |
|
0 |
Level 1 was not achieved. |
|
1-2 |
The assignment explored at least 1
different perspective to some extent, in one or more answers. |
|
3-4 |
The assignment gave a satisfactory
account of how several questions could be approached from different
perspectives, and began to explore their similarities and/or differences. |
|
5 |
The assignment gave a clear account of
how several questions could be approached from different perspectives and
considered their implications in related areas. |