In experiments sources of error to help explain results. It is important to look at results and determine if they can best be explained in terms of systematic error or random error. To help distinguish between the two consider the following example; the x's represent the location of arrows shot from a bow to the target.
Random and Systematic Error Terminology |
Precision and Accuracy Terminology |
Target Shooting Example |
Explanation |
Experimental Design Implications |
Low Random Error Low Systematic Error |
High Precision High Accuracy |
Best Result |
||
High Random Error Low Systematic Error |
Low Precision High Accuracy |
If the location of the arrows is averaged they are
on target. There is some random event (perhaps random air currents) which
causes the arrows to miss their target. |
Taking more data and averaging the result can improve
the precision in this case. |
|
Low Random Error High Systematic Error |
High Precision Low Accuracy |
There is little random error in these results, but
they have a systematic error causing all the arrows to be off target,
perhaps the sight is off or there is a constant wind which has not been
compensated for. |
Taking more measurements could not improve these results.
Perhaps the instruments are not calibrated, or perhaps a zero offset error. |
|
High Random Error High Systematic Error |
Low Precision Low Accuracy |
Both effects are present here. |